Sky as a Kite

Main menu

War and Peace Book 4

No comments
Book 4 is covered in the second half of episode 2 and most of episode 3. Everyone is suffering the consequences of their bad decision making, and I was very happy to have checked beforehand who dies and who survives in this book. Get the pop corn!

Let's introduce the villain for this part:

Tom Burke is having so much fun as Dolokhov. He does not look as described in the book (blonde and clean shaven), but his personality is the same. He messes with Pierre, simply because he hates being depended on such a loser for money and with Nikolai, because he is annoyed that Sonya is in love with the younger, cowardly, naive man, instead of him.

It is not made explicitly clear in the book whether Helene actually had an affair with Dolokhov. It is very obvious though that Dolokhov wants to get a rise out of Pierre with constantly alluding to it and is delighted when Pierre, impulsive as he is, challenges him to a duel. Shooting Pierre in a duel after humiliating him with an affair with his wife is his idea of fun. Pierre proves here that he has no right to call anyone stupid, he challenges a sharpshooter in the army to a duel, when he doesn't even know how to use a gun.

Oh Pierre....

In the book it is made more explicit that challenging Dolokhov to a duel wasn't only stupid because of the high likelihood of dying, but also because of the scandal and ruin it can bring. By challenging Dolokhov, Pierre basically publicly accuses Helene of the affair. Additionally, when she confronts him about potentially ruining her standing in society, he proposes separation, which he can only legally do by accusing her of an affair in a court of law. If he can prove it, she and her family are basically ruined, if not, he will have to pay for the separation. Pierre does not propose separation out of malice, but out of desperation to get out of a marriage that is extremely toxic for them both. Helene is of course concerned about the material implication, which are much more dangerous for her than him and being used to being able to use his fear of her to get him to do what she wants keeps pressuring him. It ends with him throwing a table. It is described as the frightening act of violence that it is and Pierre leaves her in control of most of his wealth and leaves St Petersburg in disgrace. (as he should)

Nikolai isn't much better in his decision making. His naivety, callousness with money and stubborn pride makes him fall into Dolokhov's trap. It is very clear that Dolokhov is cheating gambling with cards, but Nikolai refuses to see it and in the end ruins his family with his dept. Jack Lowden is amazing in the whole episode. He expresses all the emotions, stubborn disbelief to deer in headlights fright during the gambling scenes. When confessing to his father he goes from denial over bravado to crushing guilt and regret.

It is really sad that most of his character development stops here in the TV series. In the book he grows up after this episode, holds himself accountable for his mistakes, lives within his means and pays back all his dept. He has a lot of integrity in the book, which gets lost in the TV series.

So what about Andrei? Who dismissed all his wife's fears as trivial compared to his quest for higher purpose and honour?

Hope you like being a single father, Andrei... And he manages to become even more insufferable as a result.

During the past chapter / episodes we have been checking in with Natasha, who is slowly going from being a child to a teenager. She is quite thoughtful, wondering what it means to be in love (a recurring theme is her measuring feelings on how well she remembers her "suitors" faces, while they are away, which pays off later).

She is also very much team Pierre and always defends him when he does something stupid.

Here she is getting her first marriage proposal, from Denisov, who is nothing but lovely in the TV show (in the book he as a whole side story of stealing supplies for his regiment). The proposal, the rejection and how graciously the rejection was received were all lovely.

In my head canon he and Sonya get together at the end, because they are both lovely people and Sonya deserves a good husband instead of being basically part of Nikolai's and Marya's furniture. I mean, just look at her:






War and Peace Book 3

No comments
Book three has two major narratives, the first is Pierre's first steps as count Bezukhov and marrying Helene, the second is the battle of Austerlitz.


Here is Pierre vocalizing the narrative arc for the character. He wants to do something good, but does not know what and is constantly hindered by his own weaknesses. His weaknesses lead him to make terrible decisions and the first of many is marrying Helene (she is written Hélène, but I'm not going to bother with the accents).

Now, i have to say that I am very much team Helene, mainly because both the book and TV series sympathise with Pierre. I really would like to someone to write War and Peace from Helene's perspective. Call it "What has my idiot husband done now?". Helene's reason for marrying Pierre are very simple: He has money, she likes money and as a bonus he is easily manipulated. I became a fan of hers with this scene:


They are newly wed and she is ninja like avoiding his advances (I can relate).

In the TV series, Pierre seems to actually be infatuated with Helene. He is just apprehensive and feeling uneasy about her (the music is really funny when it comes to Helene, she has her own horror theme). The book is much more unforgiving towards his reasons. He neither loves nor respects her. The above scene would never have happened in the book, as Pierre is equally terrified of and disgusted with Helene. He constantly thinks of her as stupid (really Pierre, YOU are calling people stupid?!). He keeps on entangling himself with her because:
  1. She is hot and he really wants to sleep with her
  2. She is hot and he wants a wife he can show off with

In the end he is so deeply entangled that Vasily can simply announce the engagement:


To be fair, this would also be my reaction if I were suddenly engaged. Stunned confusion.

The marriage conflict in the series seems to be mostly, Pierre wants a real marriage, Helene only wants to be left alone and enjoy the money. In the book they are equally awful to each other. Helene is annoyed at having an unfashionable husband who habitually embarrasses himself in society. She also tells him "I'm not going to have any children with YOU" (in the TV series it is the much softer "I'm not the motherly type"). Pierre is equally judgmental. He looks down on Helene's societal ambitions and interests, thinking of her as stupid. He also, after marrying her for being seductive and hot, judges her for being very sexual (this might be Tolstoy's own view of women coming through) while constantly engaging in what Tolstoy describes as:

temptations of the bachelor circles in which he moved



Anatole is engaging on a side quest of trying to court Marya, which he immediately fucks up, because he cannot even control his impulses for a weekend and ends up seducing Marya's French companion. Tolstoy really confuses me with his treatment of women. Sometimes I get annoyed and then he goes and lets them be complicated characters. The French companion, whose name I am too lazy to look up, could have just been a superficial character, a prop to be seduced, but Tolstoy explores her emotional state. She is alone, without relations in the middle of nowhere in Russia and dreams up the live of a romance heroine for herself. She dreams of being seduced by a Russian noble, who then marries her out of compassion. Obviously, that is not what happens with Anatole. Marya has nothing but understanding for her French companion.
I like also how Tolstoy acknowledges female sexual desire. Both Marya and Natasha fall for Anatole out of sexual desire for him, not romantic feelings and while Tolstoy makes it clear that marrying someone, just because you think they are really hot is a bad idea (see Pierre), he does not condemn their feelings, but treats them as natural. Their weakness is not their desire, but their inability to fully understand it, due to their innocence. Would Tolstoy have advocated for sex ed of girls?



Austerlitz
As usual the war part is shortened a lot and with it a lot of the tension is lost. In the book there is a whole build up, with everyone but Kutuzov eager to attack the French in the name of glory, while Kutuzov argues for caution as no one knows the exact position of the French. As this is Austerlitz the reader knows it does not end well for the alliance. Before the battle the tension is increased with the fog (hiding the French) being mentioned several times with characters staring into it, wondering if they are hearing voices or seeing movement. It is a horror story moment.
The lead up to and the battle itself has also some of the first examples of the theme of how the disposition of the mass of people moves historical events, rather than singular decisions by "great men". Everyone is pushing for an attack, so Alexander gives the order. When the French appear like ghosts from the fog, the soldier panic and the disorder causes the smaller French army to win. The commanders have little influence over the battle itself, with news and orders being delivered much to slow to have any effect. So how are our boys doing?

Andrei continues to be disillusioned. When he brings news of the victory from the battle from book two, no one is impressed. All the sacrifice and heroic actions do not matter much in the big picture. He has a moment of considering his wife and family, sure he is going to heroically die.

He gets his big moment leading a charge waving a banner and gets badly insured. Close to death he has an epiphany of the insignificance of human action and his quest for glory:

It will still take a few books for him to not be insufferable.

I enjoyed Nikolai's part much more. I really like his book character and am sad his role is very reduced in the series. He is contrasted with Boris, who is way more worldly, uses his connections to advance, understands the social rules of the army, that Nikolai has a hard time learning. He dislikes using his family connections to advance in the army and calls out a superior officer when he catches him stealing, not understanding he should stay quiet to protect the honour of the regiment. Bless his heart. He also has the biggest crush on Czar Alexander.

He writes his own fanfiction in his head on performing heroic actions in front of Alexander and dying in his arms. Alexander is constantly described as very handsome, so good on them on casting a very handsome actor.




War and Peace Book 2

No comments
The last 20 minutes of the first episode of the BBC series is equally divided between all of book 2 and the first 5 chapters of book 3. This perfectly encapsulates the problem this TV series has with adapting the "war" part and it's themes from the book.

For obvious reasons Tolstoy's thought on was are more relevant now than in 2016. One can summarize his position as "War is a useless waste of human life and goes against human nature. No rational person would ever engage in it". There I saved you reading the book

Tolstoy detests Napoleon and many of his passages on history serve to argue against the myth of "great man shaping history", which Napoleon represents. Throughout the book he tries to demystify him, points out how his genius is exaggerated, how much of it was luck and most of all argues against the idolisation of a man who committed many atrocities (He insists on calling him murderer). I want to put a quote here from the first epilogue:

In Africa a whole series of outrages are committed against the almost unarmed inhabitants. And the men who commit these crimes, especially their leader, assure themselves that this is admirable, this is glory—it resembles Caesar and Alexander the Great and is therefore good.




Kutuzov, the only good general in the Russian army.

In book two both Nikolai and Andrei get their first experience with war. Their expectations of adventure and glory respectively are contrasted with the reality of the pointless slaughter of human life that war is. Tolstoy is not subtle about his anti war sentiments. Both Nikolai and Andrei get loads of character development here, which the TV series completely fails at when it comes to Andrei. I still did not like him in the book, but at least he was interesting.

In the book Andrei's motivation is a quest for meaning and purpose and he thinks he can achieve that by chasing glory in the war. Before the first battle Andrei is riding around inspecting the preparations, making strategic plans and imagines winning the battle for Russia (as he always thinks he is better than everyone around him). Maybe while dying heroically for the glory. While he is still contemplating his brilliant plans the battle just starts and all is chaos. Here he just stands melancholic in a field for a minute and then the battle starts.


Nice cinematography, but some character development would have been cool. Andrei's character in the TV series is: Bored and might as well die in war... In love with Natasha... Depressed and might as well die in war.. Dies in war (spoiler).

During the battle he notices that the most successful generals are the ones that do not make great plans, but react to the actions of the man during battle. It is one of the first instances of Tolstoy's subversion of the idea of "great man of history". He focuses on Tushin (a captain), who is not concerned with glory or recognition (very short appearance in the TV series) and therefore is one of the deciding factors in the "victory" (They stop the French, giving themselves time to regroup, nothing more). He is shat on for it and Andrei comes to his defense. None of this in in the TV series.



When he goes to the Austrian court to announce the "victory" it is shrug off as unimportant. His great heroic moment thwarted from all sides. He is disillusioned with war and the army command, except Kutuzov. No one has a regard for the common soldiers or even cares if they win or loose and only tries to use any battle as a political play to advance their position.


Nikolai's part is much better. His naivete at the beginning, seeing was as a big adventure is shown very well. Jack Lowden plays him as excitedly nervous. I like his budding friendship with Denisov. I am very grateful they did not make the actor speak with the speech impediment Denisov had in the book, it was so annoying to read. When he finally is in the middle of the battle he absolutely panics. He throws his pistol at the French instead of firing it and then runs away. It is a very short scene in the TV series, but Jack Lowden nails it, not only showing shock and fear, but also confusion, as described in the book:

"Who are they? Why are they running? Can they be coming at me? And why? To kill me? Me whom everyone is so fond of?" He remembered his mother’s love for him, and his family’s, and his friends’, and the enemy’s intention to kill him seemed impossible.





Dolokhov is missing, though. He has a whole adventure, capturing some French in the book. It is alluded to by him being called a war hero in the series. I had to stop reading and laughed out loud when it turned out he is a sharpshooter.



War and Peace Book 1

No comments
I wanted to talk about this book for some time, I have been reading it the past month and I love it. I do have to keep the discussion on my intellectually low level though, so I decided to follow the BBC series from 2016. I had watched this series before reading the book, which is why I did not give up this time. The first time I tried to read it the Russian names defeated me, especially in the second book, when Tolstoy keeps switching between calling Prince Andrei, Prince Andrei and Bolkonski in the narrative. Now that I had an image of each character in my mind, it was easier to follow. Part of this will be my random thoughts on the book and comparing the TV series to it. I read a version of the book, where it was divided in 15 books and two epilogues.

Book 1 (Episode 1, the first 40 minutes)

Paul Dano is a wonderful Pierre. Pierre is deeply flawed and makes hilariously irrational decisions throughout the book. He doesn't become comical or annoying in the book because of his kindness and emotional honesty, which Paul Dano is perfect for.
His introduction sets him up perfectly, showing his idealism and social awkwardness (I love the small detail of him just handing Anna Pavlovna his glass in this scene and her confused reaction on this complete breaking of etiquette), without making him look intentionally rude.


(He says in a room full of overfed aristocrats)

While his defense of Napoleon is funny, his interaction with Lise is peak Pierre, awkward, from a place of kindness.


"I'm not..." (realizes that mentioning pregnancy would be inappropriate)..."I mean life is...."(notices he can't save it)..."Oh, this is wrong!" Pretty much as in the book, too.

His weaknesses are a bit tuned down in the TV series. His womanizing is only addressed in the first episode, the drinking is only mentioned once again. He is more confused here than weak willed (more about it in book 2 and book 5). They also have the party only in fast cuts, lessening the impact of Pierre's stupid behaviour, such as trying to copy Dolokhov's dare and the bear incident, focusing on his regret instead.

I like how some small details are kept, such as the servant drinking the wine at the party when he thinks no one is looking. Pierre is a big man in the book, somewhere in my notes it says "Stop body shaming Pierre, Tolstoy!" as he constantly mentions him being stout "He placed his stout body in a chair". Paul Dano plays him with big clumsy gestures without it looking comical.



Strangely the TV series then makes Pierre look a bit callous about his father dying by going to Natasha's name day party. (They do not mention that it is also her mother's name day party, who is also called Natalya). When Pierre comes to Moscow in the book, he is repeatedly told that his father does not want to see him, because of the bear incidence and that the shock of hearing about the scandal is what caused his stroke(s).

Pierre can dance in the book, he just does not know that particular dance at the name day party, but obliges Natasha, because that is who he is. He is not in love with her at this point (because she is 13 in the book), but it makes sense to change it for the TV series, where they are closer in age. In the TV series he says "I can't dance" and never dances again. Probably because Paul Dano did not want to. In the book, when he later moves to Moscow, one reason he is so liked is because he is always up for dancing to make sure none of the ladies have to sit around without a partner. He also can play clavichord.



Lily James is great as Natasha. She manages to play her like a teenager at the beginning. It is some very subtle physical acting, I don't think they needed that horrible fringe. I love that her main concern with the bear incidence is if the bear is alright (she asks twice).

Nice how Anna's Mikhaylovna (there are a lot of women either called Marya or Anna in the book, adding to the confusion) motivation to help Pierre later is set up by Vasili Kuragin refusing to give her an allowance from the inheritance at the beginning of the episode. Funny, if Vasili had said yes, he would have inherited, as Pierre would have never been able to notice the conspiracy to cheat him out of the inheritance. The death of the father is pretty much as in the book, with Pierre utterly confused and Anna guiding him through how to behave like a grieving son AND uncovering the conspiracy, securing him the inheritance.


(Perpetually confused Pierre)

She deserves the allowance for her son she'll get from Pierre. I like that they kept Vasili's line "we lie and deceive, but for what, it all ends in death" it is a nice bit of nuance for the character.




Andrei in the TV series is as insufferable as in the book. He is arrogant and even worse to his wife in the book. She is not portrait very sympathetic, it's a Tolstoy and women thing. His reason for going to the war is a bit different, in the book he thinks he is too good for St. Petersburg society and is looking for glory, even if it means getting killed, but glory not boredom is his main motivation.



Andrei's father is way too likable in the TV series at the beginning. I think part of it is the actor, he is really well known and plays usually sympathetic characters. He terrorizes his family, especially Marya (who is great) from the get go. Andrei knows this and his wife, Lise is scared of his father as well. Lise is in the right. She is pregnant with her first child and scared. Instead of being supportive Andrei sends her off to his family in the countryside, to a father she is scared of, away from her friends and proper doctors and goes off to war we to chase glory and maybe die.


I think fear is the appropriate reaction here, Andrei. You are going to be so sorry in book 4.


Notes:
One of my complaint is not enough French. Tolstoy uses the upper class speaking mainly French as one of the signs of their estrangement from the "Russian soul". Pierre even mentions it in the TV series in his rant about Napoleon: "Our drawing rooms are full of overfed aristocrats, who have no idea what real life is. Who have even forgotten how to speak their own language." And then the only French sentence ever spoken is this:



It would have been nice to have some characters speak more French phrases, the way Tolstoy inserted them in the book.





I trust Simon Pegg with my Star Trek....

No comments
was my attitude before seeing the newest Star Trek, despite everyone else being worried after seeing the trailers. I love Hot Fuzz and Spaced. I have loved the Star Trek franchise ever since I was introduced to TNG when I was 18 (But at the same time could laugh about its flaws as well. After all this is my favourite Star Trek blog).

In other words the creator of a movie/series I love was taking on a franchise I love, which he loves as well. Warm fuzzy feelings all around.

I saw the trailer last Christmas, heard about the decision about Sulu and thought: I'm glad he noticed Star Trek needs more gay.

Then I saw the movie and had some stray observations:
  • Yorktown is gorgeous

  • This is the first time since TNG that I feel like I would love to live on the Enterprise

  • This is the first time I actually like Kirk and would be ok with him being my captain

  • Simon Pegg is a master of writing male friendships

  • Do Scottish people really say "lassie" that much? I keep thinking of the dog

  • All the Easter Eggs in this movie make me happy

I like my movies humorous, positive and hopeful and I was a happy fangirl coming out of the movie. Happier than I had been after the other two. So the week after I watched them again. Another list:

  • Kirk is just such a complete ass in the first movie and the movie keeps justifying his behaviour by him being right

  • The iceplanet cave is always very Empire Strikes Back to me

  • Someone calculate the odds of Kirk, Spock prime and Scotty all being in the same area on the same planet. Ford and Arthur being picked up by the Heart of Gold makes more logical sense. Being out-logiced by the Hitchikers Guide is not a good thing.

  • I always cheer a little when Spock is beating Kirk up

  • I'm completely team Spock in this movie


  • I like the idea of having a movie about the dangers of further militarization of Star Fleet

  • Scotty resigning over drone strikes without any juridical process makes him my favourite character in this movie

  • He could have disabled the ship before the first attack though, but I guess I had some hidden anger towards the crew members who were killed in the attack and felt that the Enterprise just making it back to Earth with Khan would have been too easy?

  • And he straight up murders a guy. Still the best character in this movie.

  • I actually like Kirks arc in this movie (finally learning the Kobayashi Maru lesson)

  • Kirk should have stayed dead, from a storytelling perspective (not because I don't like him, or maybe a bit because I don't like him)



Other than the difference in tone (drama vs friendship and hope) I noticed another reason the other two movies annoyed me: Fan service. Both times clunky, both times for no other reason than to provide fan service:

Last time, Zoe needed to wear underwear, and this time it was Alice Eve's turn. You know, it's a rather large male fanbase, and JJ wanted to appeal to that.
Source



Yes, sadly that is also a bit of a Star Trek tradition, but Trekkies are proud to be more concerned with stories, characters and ideas that boobs and explosions. We are better than that.

A thought occurred to me while I was watching women standing around in underwear being ogled by Kirk for our amusement. Simon Pegg would not write this kind of scene. This guy would not write this kind of scene.

I like my Star Trek inclusive, I like my Star Trek hopeful, I like my Star Trek not automatically assuming I must be a cis-gendered male. I trust Simon Pegg with my Star Trek.




Pages: [1] [2]